As a kid growing up I really liked math, because to me it made sense, as
there was only one simple definitive answer. For example 2 + 3 = 5. 5 is
the simple definitive answer. It isn’t maybe 4 if the stock market goes
down or maybe 6 if unemployment decreases. The answer to that equation is
5 on Monday, it is 5 on Thursday, it was 5 in 1927, and it will still be 5 in
2027. The answer is simple because it is definite, and because it is
definite it is fact. You can easily prove the answer is 5 by taking 2
pens and then taking 3 more pens and counting 5 pens. Now this is kindergarten math and very simple but
it even works when the numbers are bigger. 10,000 x 10,000 =
100,000,000. Now I don’t have enough pens to illustrate this equation and
it may not be simple enough for you to do it in your head, but the answer is
still simple because it is definite. No matter what the same answer will
always solve this problem.
Using capitalism as an excuse is just lazy as we could see with the bailout, we can bend the rules in certain situations. Using a simple solution like forcing everyone to have health insurance is also too simplistic to solve such a complex problem. How about giving out government funded incentives to doctors the higher percentage of their patients that they help stay healthy? How about a bailout type extreme circumstance health insurance, where the government steps in over a certain dollar amount? The answer isn't simple, definite or even just one idea, complex problems take much more to be solved correctly.
Too
often in life we try to find the same type of simple definite answer to the more complex problems we come across. The only trouble with this is that unlike the
mathematic equations listed above the answer is not simple and certainly is
not definite. Yet we try to solve these problems with opinions that we
state as if they are a matter of fact.
Cancer is a very big problem in our society and that cannot be argued. I
unfortunately, as do you know many people who have lost parents and other
relatives to this most horrible disease. Personally my mother,
grandmother and grandfather are all cancer survivors. Like many other
people I not only want the answer to the why, I want the solution. The fact is cancer kills many people every
day and another fact is that no one knows what in essence causes this horrible
disease. Everyone has heard a theory but no one comes back with
scientific evidence that what they are saying causes cancer does in fact cause
cancer.
Everyone has heard a bunch of theories on what causes cancer. Microwaves
can cause cancer don’t stand in front of them when they are on. Cell
phones can cause cancer don’t put the phone to your ear when you talk on
it. We
all have microwaves and cell phones. That means we should all have
cancer. If microwaves and cell phones cause cancer do you think standing
to the side and talking on speakerphone would prevent you from getting
it? My point being that we
need to stop being lazy and looking for the simple answer to complex problems.
I do
not support Mr. Obama, yet I still have this crazy belief that everyone should
have the access to health care. Call me a communist, but I just don’t
believe that you should have to die or go bankrupt because you were one of the
unfortunate ones to get sick. The premise of the popular show “Breaking
Bad” starts out with a hardworking middle class man getting diagnosed with lung
cancer and at first he chooses just to die rather than put his family in
financial distress. He later resorts to selling meth so that he can
afford to be sick. We are supposed to live in the greatest country in the
world, yet not everyone can get the best treatment for deadly diseases?
Now
all the people come out with their pitchforks and burning torches raving about
socialism and that capitalism doesn’t allow for this. We’re
not talking about a car here; I’m not saying everyone should be able to drive a
Ferrari, so those that can’t afford one get one pro bono. I just believe
that the American public deserves access to the best treatment possible against diseases like
cancer, regardless how many commas their bank account balance shows.
The
simple solution of forcing everyone by law to have healthcare is not the
solution. Unfortunately as Obamacare seems to be showing us all, that
once again we cannot solve the complex problems of the world with a simple
answer.
Just because Obamacare is shaping up to be one of the greatest failures
in this country’s history doesn’t mean that what the law was attempting to do
is wrong. Everything isn’t black or
white or more famously in this country Republican or Democrat. There isn’t just two simplistic ways to solve
a problem.
By saying that universal healthcare goes against what is supposed to
happen in a capitalistic society is just lazy and shuts down all thought
process. Instead we should be asking how
could we make this work in a capitalistic society? This forces our brains to work
at trying to find a solution. The “capitalist”
were not talking about how the bailout was in fact socialistic, and they never
will. When you talk about taxing the
rich to give to the poor it is socialism, but when you take the taxes the poor
and middle class pay and use it to bail out failing companies it isn’t? The same companies that cried socialism when
the government was trying to regulate them cried for money and that they needed
a bailout to survive.
They used the term Laissez-faire and talked about the invisible hand and
how it corrects and controls the market beforehand. However, when the invisible hand turned on them and told them it was time to fail they didn’t want to accept
it. Capitalism is a very simplistic
ideal, the market sets the price through supply and demand. If you raise your price too high it gets
corrected to the accurate price by the market’s unwillingness to pay that
price. It also forces the company to be
efficient and not wasteful as that leads to lower cost which leads to higher profits. This is in turn the invisible hand. If the corner deli wants to charge you $10
for a 8 ounce cup of coffee after one day of not selling a single cup the owner knows that he has to lower his price. This is the principle of the invisible hand correcting the market.
The invisible hand was doing its job when it was about to slam the “too big to fail” companies into the ground. They broke one of the rules by not being efficient in giving ARM loans to everyone, thus increasing the demand of home buyers which drives up the price of homes since the supply stayed about the same. When they had to foreclose on a bunch of the unqualified people they lent money to, they had all these homes that were overvalued that no one could afford to buy. The price of homes was inflated to a price that the market was unwilling to pay and the invisible hand had to correct it. The bank doesn’t want your home; they are not in the real estate business they are in the loan business. They now had all these homes, that were overvalued, that they didn’t want and couldn’t sell and now were in big trouble.
The invisible hand was doing its job when it was about to slam the “too big to fail” companies into the ground. They broke one of the rules by not being efficient in giving ARM loans to everyone, thus increasing the demand of home buyers which drives up the price of homes since the supply stayed about the same. When they had to foreclose on a bunch of the unqualified people they lent money to, they had all these homes that were overvalued that no one could afford to buy. The price of homes was inflated to a price that the market was unwilling to pay and the invisible hand had to correct it. The bank doesn’t want your home; they are not in the real estate business they are in the loan business. They now had all these homes, that were overvalued, that they didn’t want and couldn’t sell and now were in big trouble.
Using capitalism as an excuse is just lazy as we could see with the bailout, we can bend the rules in certain situations. Using a simple solution like forcing everyone to have health insurance is also too simplistic to solve such a complex problem. How about giving out government funded incentives to doctors the higher percentage of their patients that they help stay healthy? How about a bailout type extreme circumstance health insurance, where the government steps in over a certain dollar amount? The answer isn't simple, definite or even just one idea, complex problems take much more to be solved correctly.
The
facts are right in front of us. Yet we still keep going back to the idea that
we can solve complex problems with simple solutions. After the Sandy Hook
tragedy the most common solution that was talked about was taking away the
personal right to bear arms, again looking for the simple solution. Drugs
are illegal, but people still get them, in essence the solution we are
endorsing is sort of like turning away and looking in the other direction.
On the surface it would seem that outlawing all firearms would be solving
the problem and all the politicians would go on CNN and MSNBC and gloat
about how they got this done and the difference it will make. All they
would have accomplished would be sweeping the problem under the rug.
The
problem is bigger than just someone getting access to a firearm and using it to
murder innocent people, we need to dig deeper and be preventive. People
are resourceful and just like people who want to get high get access to illegal drugs;
if guns became illegal they would be able to get access to them as well.
This is a reactive mentality instead of taking a proactive approach, but this
is how we are trained to act.
We put criminals in prison and lock them away and forget about them instead of learning how to stop the next generation of criminals from becoming criminals. We focus on finding cures for diseases, instead of finding out how to prevent people from getting sick. We put band-aids on cuts that need stitches and wonder why they never healed. We get flat tires and leave the donut on and eventually that donut wares out and we are in much worse shape then we were at the beginning. There is a price for always using the quick-fix method as is evidenced by our astonishing national debt that is ever rising. Using simple answers that are not definite only sweeps problems under the rug and makes us think we did something better, only to find out that we are in worse shape down the road then when we started.
We put criminals in prison and lock them away and forget about them instead of learning how to stop the next generation of criminals from becoming criminals. We focus on finding cures for diseases, instead of finding out how to prevent people from getting sick. We put band-aids on cuts that need stitches and wonder why they never healed. We get flat tires and leave the donut on and eventually that donut wares out and we are in much worse shape then we were at the beginning. There is a price for always using the quick-fix method as is evidenced by our astonishing national debt that is ever rising. Using simple answers that are not definite only sweeps problems under the rug and makes us think we did something better, only to find out that we are in worse shape down the road then when we started.